| | | |
Note: The archive of recent HPA Newsletters re COVID 19 is located at:
People can sign up here for the newsletter. Please share the information with others! We will get through this together. Thanks!
We're filling in the details for you ...
###
Are We Experiencing Global Infection-induced Stealth Euthanasia, aka bio-warfare?
Or, Was this just an accident or a naturally-occurring virus?
If an accident, why would the Chinese researchers manipulate a bat coronavirus to be capable of infecting humans?
The research "paper trail" on bat coronaviruses and others for the Bat Lady, Shi Zhengli, is extensive going back decades. It is also well-known that the Chinese pursue Dual-Use Research that could be pure science but also can be used to develop weaponry.
We know that as Director of NIH's NIAID, Fauci has funded some of this research by the "Bat Lady" in the US and in Wuhan, China.
Why would he do that? And why would he have continued to do that even after being warned that the research was dangerous? After the Obama administration stopped that funding a few years ago? And after scientists around the world objected to this type of research?
What was Fauci thinking? Hmmm...
We have listed below dozens of her studies (you can skim them or skip over them if you're not interested) but it shows the development of knowledge needed to bio-engineer a bat coronavirus if you chose to do so, and these show that they had created a chimeric virus, combining viruses, which is what the SARS CoV-2 virus appears to be. How it arose is debated.
Well, if it is a "man-made" manipulated virus, those who made it know the truth, but at this point, for the rest of us, the question remains, "What to do about it?"
Many are jumping on the band-wagon saying that as more data is coming in, with much more testing of the population, the "case fatality rate" is now obviously much lower than we were led to believe, because so many who had no symptoms are testing positive for antibodies, showing they had been infected sometime in the past.
This appears to be good news for many, but doesn't do anything for those who get very sick or die. That includes very few children, some young and older adults, and many of the elderly or those who have those "risk factors."
We need to remember that the scientists have stated they have found various strains of this virus already, that these seem to be similar in effect, and that so far, they don't seem to be more lethal than any other. See:
8 strains of the coronavirus are circling the globe. Here's what clues they're giving scientists
Elizabeth Weise Updated March 31, 2020 USA TODAY
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/03/27/scientists-track-coronavirus-strains-mutation/5080571002/
But, how do we know that other strains might be more lethal? Some believe there may be other bio-engineered viruses not yet released. That may be "projection," or imagination, or simple paranoia, but with a global pandemic going on, it is not too far-fetched to believe that it might be a possibility.
Authorities are cautioning us that we don't know what will occur in a "2nd wave" this Fall or even next year! Virologists tell us that usually the mutations make the infection weaker, but we will see. Since there are different strains already out there, and others could arise later on, we really need to be prepared for more who become ill and some of those will tragically die.
However, it is becoming clearer every day that the push for "more and more testing" leads to the next question: Will we need to prove we have antibodies, were infected, and are not infectious in some way? Many are asking, "Will we need a Coronavirus 'passport?"
Bill Gates has long pushed for a global digital ID program. Is this the "crisis" that will cause us (or our wonderful leaders) to see the need for global tracking/ID of everyone of us?
About those Nazi scientists brought to the US: some have commented that not all the Nazi scientists brought to the USA in Operation Paper Clip held Nazi views and some opposed the Third Reich.
That is true, but the Nazi scientists worked with the Nazi leaders nevertheless and furthered Nazi efforts.
I'm reminded of those who challenge us by saying: "You always have a choice!" Of course, some would respond that: "They forced me to do it!" But, those Nazi scientists who chose to continue to work under the regime did so knowing they were contributing to that cause.
Yes, the Nazi authorities threatened many. They did kill many who refused to cooperate. German and citizens of other nations were terrified under the brutal Nazi martial law.
At the Nuremberg Trials after the war, "the defendants generally acknowledged that the crimes they were accused of occurred but denied that they were responsible, as they were following orders from a higher authority." The court rejected that defense. See:
The Nuremberg Trials
Staff Jan 5, 2018 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nuremberg-trials
Any Nazi officer, doctor, or other participant in any way, and we as well, still always have a choice whether to cooperate with evil or to refuse to do so. Martyrs, whistle-blowers, and those who simply stand up against tyranny of various sorts, know about that type of choice and refuse(d) to cooperate with evil or refuse(d) to be silenced by those in power. But, it is not easy, we are human and weak. Most of us would fail the test in those terrible circumstances.
Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer refused to be silent, refused to work with the Nazis, and actively spoke out against them, was part of a conspiracy against Hitler, and yes, he was arrested and then later hung shortly before the end of the war, but he made his choice and was faithful to his Lord. See:
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Staff Accessed April 2020 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/dietrich-bonhoeffer
We may face harassment, censorship, silencing, retaliation, loss of employment, financial ruin, or -- in the case of the Nazis (and Communist Chinese, for example) -- execution, but that never deprives us of our ability to choose. We will all answer to God one day for what we choose to do with the free will He has given us.
With regard to the FDA that has approved many dangerous medications (some later withdrawn from the market after making billions in profit for the manufacturer), the pharmaceutical companies have conducted their own double-blind randomized trials of many medications and had them approved by the FDA.
Sometimes, negative results from studies done by the manufacturer are hidden, suppressed, or not allowed to be completed and published and only positive results are allowed to be shared.
Sometimes questions about the safety of medications are disregarded by the FDA's members. How is it that the FDA yet approves these medications even when many of these medications have later been found to be the cause of terrible harm to the patients who receive them!
In these cases, the FDA leaders' actions demonstrate negligence and a failure to serve the people and protect them. When the results of such actions result in thousands being harmed, and prevented from being helped, it amounts to criminal negligence and fascism.
Why fascism and what is fascism? There are many differing opinions about how to definie it, but when the government -- for example, the FDA, Governors, or other "elites" in government -- controls the medical industry, physicians, or economic activity in a nation, and does not allow dissent by individuals or groups of individuals, or does not allow the pursuit of inexpensive cures for many medical conditions, that is medical fascism in action.
This is not "conspiracy theory." It is the reality. Yet, how many physicians, nurses, or scientists even say anything about it?
Not only are nurses afraid to speak out about the truth in the healthcare setting, many physicians are afraid to speak out about that and in the case of COVID 19, about other treatment regimens for fear of being blackballed or worse.
Some physicians have been removed from practice treating COVID 19 patients because they believed other methods were preferred and that the methods being mandated -- by the hospital where they worked -- were actually harmful.
That is what happened in the case of Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell, MD of New York (we shared links to his videos in the previous newsletter). He was removed from the "COVID 19" treatment unit and transferred to another unit because he disagreed with the mandatory protocol being applied to all the patients at his hospital where patients were not permitted to receive less invasive treatments and were given high pressure ventilation.
He believes that the high pressure setting provided by the ventilators being used for COVID 19 patients was actually causing lung damage and suggested that physicians use lower pressures and other treatments to help the patients. He states that the patients display oxygen deprivation not because they can't breathe, but because the blood is not carrying the oxygen normally.
That is why he is saying that for many, they don't need the ventilators as much as they need treatment to help correct the problem with the ability of blood to carry oxygen to the cells. Of course, in some cases, patients stop breathing because of neurological affects of the infection and in those cases, the patients need to have a ventilator breathe for them until (if) they recover.
This aligns with the insights provided by medical researchers who alerted the world to the possibility this is also a "blood disease," not just a lung disease:
Scientists Study Coronavirus Attack on Hemoglobin, Iron, & Test New Treatments with Old Standbys
By Hana Levi Julian April 10, 2020
https://www.jewishpress.com/news/us-news/ny/scientists-study-coronavirus-attack-on-hemoglobin-test-new-treatments-with-old-standbys/2020/04/10/
Here we have a discussion of bio-warfare development in China, the debate about the ethicality of the research done in the US, Australia, Canada, and China (some funded by Fauci), and a list of some journal articles that really stand out when you think of the stepping stones to creating a bio-weapon.
These research studies, we are told, are always, of course, done to "understand" more and "never" for malevolent purposes, according to the researchers. Right!
###
Now to the "Bat Lady" (that's what medical researcher, Dr. Shi Zhengli, is known as. She has spent decades studying bat coronaviruses and other viruses as well as how they may infect humans. Was all of this for our good?
She didn't just experiment on viruses in a petri dish:
Dr. Shi Zhengli and the Wuhan Institute of Virology Connected to Coronavirus EXPERIMENTED WITH LIVE ANIMALS …And We Have Proof!
By Jim Hoft April 10, 2020
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/exclusive-dr-shi-zhengli-wuhan-institute-virology-connected-coronavirus-experimented-live-animals-proof/
What are we to make of this? Are these scientific researchers heroes fighting to defeat diseases that afflict humans or something else? Should we thank them for incredible, relentless dedication to the work?
Or, should we condemn them for working tirelessly to create a bio-weapon at the behest of the communists that may have caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions over time? How can we know which they deserve?
China's Bio-warfare program
It is well-known that several nations have conducted bio-warfare research for decades, the USA, Russia, China, North Korea, and others are well-known. That Japan used bio-warfare against China is well-known and has not been forgotten by the Chinese.
China’s Biological Warfare Programme: An Integrative Study with Special
Reference to Biological Weapons Capabilities
Dany Shoham (2015): Journal of Defence Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2 April-June 2015, pp. 131-156
http://idsa.in/jds/9_2_2015_ChinasBiologicalWarfareProgramme.html
full article at: https://idsa.in/system/files/jds/jds_9_2_2015_DanyShoham.pdf
Historical and Geostrategic Factors A combination of past and present geostrategic factors distinctly affect the Chinese approaches and outlooks with regard to [BioWarfare "BW"] BW. The first major factor is the relapsing Japanese BW attacks against and human BW experimenting on Chinese populations, which took place from 1933 to 1945, killing and injuring tens of thousands, without the Chinese being able to cope or retaliate.
The employment of BW against the Chinese by the Japanese military had a long-lasting impact in China. The Chinese official news agency, Xinhua, reported in 2002, that ‘at least 270,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians were slaughtered by Japanese germ-warfare troops between 1933 and 1945’, according to an ‘in-depth study by Chinese and Japanese scholars.’ The second factor is the Chinese belief (whether sound or unsound) that the United States (US) conducted BW offensive operations in China China’s Biological Warfare Programme (and North Korea) during the Korean War (1950–53), alongside with the evident fact that between 1950 and 1972, the US possessed an operational BW arsenal. The third factor concerns the then Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Allegedly, near the end of World War II, USSR conducted experiments with plague, anthrax and cholera in Sovietoccupied Mongolia.
Later on, tests with various vaccines were conducted by the USSR in Mongolia for a long period of time, concomitantly with the persisting communist brotherhood between China and USSR and their strategic cooperation in general, and Chinese awareness and following (to a certain extent) of the colossal BW programme run by the USSR in particular.
A comprehensive study of the aspects pertaining to those geostrategic factors was published in 1999—entitled China and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Implications for the United States—within the framework of a conference sponsored by the US National Intelligence Council and Federal Research Division. Collectively, these solidly formed Chinese perspectives shaped the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) approaches and outlooks pertaining to BW, and yielded, naturally, a wide Chinese BWP [BioWarfare Program] which still persists fully viably—if appreciably concealed—and comprises both defensive and offensive sub-programmes."
Looking at the references provided is very insightful if you're interested.
Fauci funded the Chinese Bat Lady's research that was condemned! Yet Fauci funded it again, why? Knowing that this research could and would likely be considered by Chinese military for dual use purposes, he still funded it! Why? The question never goes away.
So, now there are energetic debates about what the SARS CoV-2 virus is, whether it arose from animals naturally, or whether it is a bio-engineered virus. China denies that it is bio-engineered and others state that the virus' unique genetic makeup cannot occur naturally.
The technology needed to create such a virus involved "gain of function" research (that Fauci funded) which looks to discover methods needed to increase the ability of a pathogen to infect humans, to make it more spreadable, and make it more lethal, among other factors. In 2014, the US Obama administration put a pause on funding for such research that had been conducted here because of the risks involved. Questions were raised as to whether such research should be done at all. See:
U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding
Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses
U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services/
Office of the Asst Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR)
October 17, 2014
https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/documents/gain-of-function.pdf
Back in 2015, major concerns were raised about some of the research being conducted in China and elsewhere along these lines. Here is the article raising concerns about this research:
Note that the publisher, Nature journal states that they believe and "scientists" believe that the coronavirus is animal-derived and not "engineered." But which scientists agree with Nature and which scientists tell us there is no doubt it is bio-engineered? Maybe we'll learn the truth in time:
Engineered Bat virus stirs debate over Risky Research
Lab-made coronavirus related to SARS can infect human cells.
Declan Butler 12 November 2015
https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-research-1.18787
"Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus."
[from the article:]
"An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.
In an article published in Nature Medicine on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the [human] cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them..." "But other virologists question whether the information gleaned from the experiment justifies the potential risk. Although the extent of any risk is difficult to assess, Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, points out that the researchers have created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he says." The argument is essentially a rerun of the debate over whether to allow lab research that increases the virulence, ease of spread or host range of dangerous pathogens — what is known as ‘gain-of-function’ research. In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding [by Fauci/NIAID] of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome, a deadly disease caused by a virus that sporadically jumps from camels to people). The latest study was already under way before the US moratorium began, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) allowed it to proceed while it was under review by the agency, says Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a co-author of the study. The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium, he says...." "Without the experiments, says Baric, the SHC014 virus would still be seen as not a threat. Previously, scientists had believed, on the basis of molecular modelling and other studies, that it should not be able to infect human cells. The latest work shows that the virus has already overcome critical barriers, such as being able to latch onto human receptors and efficiently infect human airway cells, he says. “I don't think you can ignore that.” He plans to do further studies with the virus in non-human primates, which may yield data more relevant to humans."
"... French virologist and medicine Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier has claimed that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that led to the global pandemic, is “man-made” as it’s the result of an attempt to manufacture a vaccine against the AIDS virus in a Chinese laboratory. Interviewed on a French news channel, the co-discoverer of the AIDS virus who bagged the 2008 Nobel award in medicine along with other two other scientists alleged the “presence of elements of HIV and germ of malaria in the genome of coronavirus is highly suspect and the characteristics of the virus could not have arisen naturally”. Montagnier alleged that an “industrial” accident was said to have taken place in the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, which specialises in these coronaviruses since early 2000s...."
"... China has refuted allegations that the coronavirus may have originated in a Wuhan laboratory. Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian cited the World Health Organisation chief and other unidentified medical experts as saying that there was no evidence that transmission began from the laboratory and there was “no scientific basis” for such claims."
Others say that the winner of the Nobel prize is wrong and his conclusion is ridiculous. I guess the "experts" don't always agree. Should we at least consider that maybe the virologist who is one of the top virologists in the world (won the Nobel Prize), might be correct?
Biological research can be what is called "Dual Use"
1) done for the welfare of the people (understanding disease and development of vaccines, for example) or
2) Done for biowarfare
Science and Security in a Post 9/11 World: A Report Based on Regional Discussions Between the Science and Security Communities.
National Research Council (US) Committee on a New Government-University Partnership for Science and Security. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11496/
"In the life sciences, dual-use research “encompasses biological research with legitimate scientific purpose, the results of which may be misused to pose a biologic threat to public health and/or national security.” Generally, the term tends to refer to technologies that have both a civilian and a military use. The dual-use research dilemma in the life sciences refers to the conundrum of producing and publishing research within the life sciences that is directed toward or intended to improve public health, animal health, or agricultural productivity, but that in the hands of a rogue state, terrorist group, or individual, could be used to impair public health. As early as the 18th century, greater understanding of the smallpox virus led to the first viral vaccine, as well as use of the virus as a bioweapon."
Just as any object or technology or knowledge around us could be used properly, it can be misused in an act of aggression to harm others. The same is true with regard to research: any research that provides greater understanding of disease transmission and the nature of viruses or bacteria or other pathogens, can be misused by malevolent individuals or a nations' agents to manipulate those pathogens to create a biological warfare agent and then inflict it on others. However, there is no proof China released this on purpose, but it may have leaked out accidentally. Why would they create it?
Selected Journal Articles with Research Done by the Chinese Bat Lady, Shi Zhengli
just the titles give us insight into the general trend of her research but read them for yourself if you wish:
2009
Differential stepwise evolution of SARS coronavirus functional proteins in different host species.
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Mar 5;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-52.
Tang X1, Li G, Vasilakis N, Zhang Y, Shi Z, Zhong Y, Wang LF, Zhang S.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261195
There's been a lot of discussion of the "Spike" protein where the virus attaches within the cell. Understanding that is necessary for the creation of a virus that will infect a human.
Immunogenicity difference between the SARS coronavirus and the bat SARS-like coronavirus spike (S) proteins.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 Sep 18;387(2):326-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.025. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
Zhou P1, Han Z, Wang LF, Shi Z.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19595990
2010
We are told that the organs with the most ACE2 receptors are where the virus most attacks people
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry
Arch Virol. 2010 Oct;155(10):1563-9. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6. Epub 2010 Jun 22. Hou Y1, Peng C, Yu M, Li Y, Han Z, Li F, Wang LF, Shi Z.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567988
Intraspecies diversity of SARS-like coronaviruses in Rhinolophus sinicus and its implications for the origin of SARS coronaviruses in humans.
J Gen Virol. 2010 Apr;91(Pt 4):1058-62. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.016378-0. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Yuan J1, Hon CC, Li Y, Wang D, Xu G, Zhang H, Zhou P, Poon LL, Lam TT, Leung FC, Shi Z.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20016037
Identification of key amino acid residues required for horseshoe bat angiotensin-I converting enzyme 2 [ACE2] to function as a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
J Gen Virol. 2010 Jul;91(Pt 7):1708-12. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.020172-0. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
Yu M1, Tachedjian M, Crameri G, Shi Z, Wang LF.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335495
Hmm. Key amino acids needed for SARS Coronavirus to attach to ACE2 receptors They just need to understand these things for the good of the world, don't they! Or to kill people?
2013
Identification of immunogenic determinants of the spike protein of SARS-like coronavirus.
Zhou P1, Han Z, Wang LF, Shi Z.
Virol Sin. 2013 Apr;28(2):92-6. doi: 10.1007/s12250-013-3292-y. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12250-013-3292-y.pdf
2015
Two Mutations Were Critical for Bat-to-Human Transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus.
J Virol. 2015 Sep;89(17):9119-23. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01279-15. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Yang Y, Liu C, Du L, Jiang S, Shi Z, Baric RS, Li F.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063432
Bat origin of human coronaviruses.
Virol J. 2015 Dec 22;12:221. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0422-1.
Hu B1, Ge X1, Wang LF2, Shi Z3.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689940
"Understanding the bat origin of human coronaviruses is helpful for the prediction and prevention of another pandemic emergence in the future."
Hmmm...
2016
Coronavirus: epidemiology, genome replication and the interactions with their hosts.
Virol Sin. 2016 Feb;31(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s12250-016-3746-0.
Shi ZL1, Guo D2, Rottier PJ3.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26908210
2017
Cross-neutralization of SARS coronavirus-specific antibodies against bat SARS-like coronaviruses
Sci China Life Sci. 2017 Dec;60(12):1399-1402. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9189-3. Epub 2017 Nov 10. PMID: 29134417 PMCID: PMC7089274 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9189-3
Zeng LP1, Ge XY1, Peng C1, Tai W2, Jiang S2,3, Du L4, Shi ZL5.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089274/pdf/11427_2017_Article_9189.pdf
"... our results have demonstrated that most SARS-CoV RBD-specific antibodies tested in this study could cross-neutralize SL-CoV strain WIV1, but not SHC014. While SARS-CoV and WIV1 have comparable RBD, the RBD of SHC014 is much more variable, as previously noted (Figure S1 in Supporting Information). More specifically, the RBD of SHC014 has a difference of 24 amino acids (aa) compared to that of SARS-CoV, while the RBD of WIV1 only has a difference of 8 aa. This may explain why SHC014 could not be cross-neutralized effectively by most antibodies (mAbs or pAbs) targeting SARS-CoV RBD.
The fact that SHC014 retains its ability to infect human cells implies that the available antibodies and vaccines based on SARS-CoV RBD will not protect the next SARS-like disease caused by bat SL-CoV SHC014 strain. Thus, further development of effective vaccines and treatments for potential infection by the SL-CoV strains, as represented by SHC014, is urgently needed. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81290341, 31621061 to Zheng-Li Shi), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB0301 to Zheng-Li Shi), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of National Institutes of Health grant (R01AI110964 to Zheng-Li Shi), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1201000 to Shibo Jiang) and NIH grant (R01AI098775 to Shibo Jiang and Lanying Du)
2018
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China. Virol Sin. 2018 Feb;33(1):104-107. doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Wang N1,2, Li SY3, Yang XL1, Huang HM3, Zhang YJ1, Guo H1,2, Luo CM1,2, Miller M4, Zhu G4, Chmura AA4, Hagan E4, Zhou JH5, Zhang YZ5,6, Wang LF7, Daszak P4, Shi ZL8. PMID: 29500691 PMCID: PMC6178078 DOI: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178078/
"This study was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (81290341) to ZLS; the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (Award Number R01AI110964) to PD and ZLS [Shi Zhengli], United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT project Grant (Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-A-14-00102) to PD; and Singapore NRF-CRP Grant (NRF2012NRF-CRP001–056) and CD-PHRG Grant (CDPHRG/0006/2014) to LFW."
Discovery of Novel Bat Coronaviruses in South China That Use the Same Receptor as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
J Virol. 2018 Jun 13;92(13). pii: e00116-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00116-18. Print 2018 Jul 1.
Luo CM, Wang N, Yang XL, Liu HZ, Zhang W, Li B, Hu B, Peng C, Geng QB, Zhu GJ, Li F, Shi ZL.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669833
" Our study expands the host ranges of MERS-related CoV and represents an important step toward establishing bats as the natural reservoir of MERS-CoV. These findings may lead to improved epidemiological surveillance of MERS-CoV and the prevention and control of the spread of MERS-CoV to humans." Acknowledgements: We thank Lanying Du for the mouse antiserum and monoclonal antibody against MERS-CoV-spike. This study was jointly funded by the Scientific and Technological Basis Special Project (2013FY113500) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China to Z.-L.S., a USAID Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT project grant (Cooperative Agreement no. AID-OAA-A-14-00102), NIH grants (R01AI110964 to Z.-L.S. [Shi Zhengli] ; R01AI089728 and R01AI110700 to F.L.), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31727901) to Z.-L.S.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are two highly transmissible and pathogenic viruses that emerged in humans at the beginning of the 21st century. Both viruses likely originated in bats, and genetically diverse coronaviruses that are related to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV were discovered in bats worldwide. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge on the origin and evolution of these two pathogenic coronaviruses and discuss their receptor usage; we also highlight the diversity and potential of spillover of bat-borne coronaviruses [meaning from bats to other species], as evidenced by the recent spillover of swine acute diarrhoea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) to pigs.
Well, they could have been worried about spillover of bat coronaviruses to humans but they could have been figuring how to do it! If anyone at all on Earth knew how to do it, who would know how to do it? I wonder...
And, Fauci funded it.
See the video/documentary below (if you haven't already) to see the progression of Shi Zhengli's research summarized for you. The excellent documentary on this very subject by The Epoch Times is here:
This explains how the virus was engineered step by step using knowledge gathered in other nations such as the US, Canada, Australia, France, etc. It explains the Bat Lady's research history:
###
In the "Out of the Shadows" documentary, we see how the Nazi doctors were brought to the US and what the US, its CIA and other organization did to control what people today (and in the past) think:
You will understand what the Leftists have done with the entertainment media and society to control how many citizens think over the past several decades.
Read the The Rockefeller Foundation and Global Business Network plan that we have all been subjected to throughout the world and pay attention to their "lockdown" plan. Look at the chapter beginning on page 18 entitled:
"LOCK STEP Scenario Narratives"
"A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."
See:
"Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development"
"...Supreme excellence [in defeating your enemy] consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting."
- The Art of War, ch III,2 "Attack by Strategem," by Lao Tse
So, the "greatest" deception in this "war" is to get us -- their enemy -- to willingly agree to surrender to some degree of "martial law," shutdowns, or "more authoritarian" government, contrary to the US Constitution!
Bill Gates has repeatedly and publicly expressed support for reducing the human population by 10% to 15% (and don't let anyone convince you otherwise). He stated this as clear as can be many times, here, for example:
Innovating to Zero Bill Gates TED Talk Feb 20, 2010
Listen very carefully. He equates you and me to "the problem." He equates you and me to creators of "evil" CO2 emissions that must be reduced to Zero!
And, Bill Gates says very clearly that one part of getting to "zero" emissions is to reduce the world population by 10-15% through the use of vaccines!
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given $ millions in grants to the World Health Organization and the NIH.
###
Save Yourself from Immunity "Storm"
Russell L Blaylock, MD The Blaylock Wellness Report Vol 15, No 4
###
COVID 19 Stats from every country
If you are new to HPA, our Main Topics are located at:
and other articles by Ron Panzer are located at:
We don't receive grants or any aid from anyone but you! We do this so that we can remain independent and uncensored by any other influences.
We need your help!
If you wish to help volunteer with the projects we are working on, let us know and please feel free to write to us with any questions or comments.
Thanks!
All healthcare must be pro-life, otherwise it is not healthcare!
Ron Panzer for Hospice Patients Alliance | | | | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment